割蓆
第十二日。
張永霖趁著公布調查亞姐選舉,一併講到接受王維基辭任亞視行政總裁。
張永霖話,王維基辭職是基於兩人處事方式不同,佢提到最初是他本人推薦王維基加入亞視出任行政總裁,但經過呢個幾星期合作,證明兩人有分歧,佢已經接納王維基辭職。
由Day 1 開始,見「魔童」同「名妓」做show,當名妓突然提到「背對背」,已經??對王維基前途有點憂慮.......
其實再睇亞視員工大會的表現,我只可以說,王維基當日表現是思路清晰,很清楚自己要如何帶領亞視走出「幽谷」,明白硬闖無線只有死路一條,將焦點放在「非劇集中高檔中產路線」,擺脫「中央十台」型像,亞視才有出路。
學王維基自己講,他很清楚一間公司應如何營運,目前亞視的死結不在缺乏創意,也不是輸在慣性收視,而是內部運作嚴重缺乏效率,而且沒有一個商業機構應有的公司文化,有表現的人、往往很快煙沒在人事鬥爭或架構疊屋下。
因此王維基上周先很有信心地說,他有八成把握可以將亞視營運作出改善。
在兩人新任命公布首日,我們己膽粗粗預言,兩人在一年內一定分手,估不到的是,365日撐不了,只有12日。
幾日內就有如此大轉變,壓力肯定不是來自下層,而是張永霖這位代表大股東的執行主席。
施老闆上周都揚言,即使王維基有幾叻,亞視都係無可救藥......
似乎一切又會打回原形,日後亦唔會吸引到任何人才到亞視。
老實講,其實有點失望。
張永霖趁著公布調查亞姐選舉,一併講到接受王維基辭任亞視行政總裁。
張永霖話,王維基辭職是基於兩人處事方式不同,佢提到最初是他本人推薦王維基加入亞視出任行政總裁,但經過呢個幾星期合作,證明兩人有分歧,佢已經接納王維基辭職。
由Day 1 開始,見「魔童」同「名妓」做show,當名妓突然提到「背對背」,已經??對王維基前途有點憂慮.......
其實再睇亞視員工大會的表現,我只可以說,王維基當日表現是思路清晰,很清楚自己要如何帶領亞視走出「幽谷」,明白硬闖無線只有死路一條,將焦點放在「非劇集中高檔中產路線」,擺脫「中央十台」型像,亞視才有出路。
學王維基自己講,他很清楚一間公司應如何營運,目前亞視的死結不在缺乏創意,也不是輸在慣性收視,而是內部運作嚴重缺乏效率,而且沒有一個商業機構應有的公司文化,有表現的人、往往很快煙沒在人事鬥爭或架構疊屋下。
因此王維基上周先很有信心地說,他有八成把握可以將亞視營運作出改善。
在兩人新任命公布首日,我們己膽粗粗預言,兩人在一年內一定分手,估不到的是,365日撐不了,只有12日。
幾日內就有如此大轉變,壓力肯定不是來自下層,而是張永霖這位代表大股東的執行主席。
施老闆上周都揚言,即使王維基有幾叻,亞視都係無可救藥......
似乎一切又會打回原形,日後亦唔會吸引到任何人才到亞視。
老實講,其實有點失望。
留言
For Mr. Cheung, I predict another dead end for ATV. Dare to bet again, he will not last for long too.-SC
"不過以今天兩人的性格迴異,可以大膽預言,這個組合不會維持很久。"
勁!!!!!
-_-'
Personally,I do not think Mr. Cheung is the type of person who is able to make such changes. Mr. Cheung was brought up in big companies where the sucessful of his career is tied more to handling of the burecratics and playing of powers than to really get out into the market and fight neck to neck with the competitors. Mr. Cheung is a good operation manager but not a type appropriate for CEO nor Chairman. He might be good to overhaul a plane but not a TV station. Dare to say again, his days with ATV are numbered.
I do not know or met Mr. Cheung or Wong before but based on mentalities, Mr. Wong is far better than Mr. Cheung to lead ATV out of the dark but the drawback is Mr. Wong is his mouth is opening to wide and too easy in his wordings. It is just like poison pills to kill himself. May be I can recommend Mr. Wong needs to re-read 孙子兵法again. -SC
Personally,I do not think Mr. Cheung is the type of person who is able to make such changes. Mr. Cheung was brought up in big companies where the sucessful of his career is tied more to handling of the burecratics and playing of powers than to really get out into the market and fight neck to neck with the competitors. Mr. Cheung is a good operation manager but not a type appropriate for CEO nor Chairman. He might be good to overhaul a plane but not a TV station. Dare to say again, his days with ATV are numbered.
I do not know or met Mr. Cheung or Wong before but based on their mentalities, Mr. Wong is far better than Mr. Cheung to lead ATV out of the dark but the drawback is Mr. Wong is always has his mouth widely opened and choose of words without real deep considerations. It is just like poison pills to kill himself. May be I can recommend Mr. Wong needs to re-read 孙子兵法again. -SC
早知如此,又何必當初?